Good news is that Mac OS X 10.6 is OpenCL compatible.
Intel, may very well be the next Monsanto. Some evil companies such as Monsanto actually survive and thrive after a barrage of legal law suites because they have so much money and influence over the government. We'll be stuck with few selections, little to no innovations and high prices. Remember Rockafeller and Gates when they were building their empires? I assure you there are corpbloggers in this thread. They employ hundreds of bloggers to hype up their products while bashing their competitors. Their influence over the judicial system, developers and system manufactures is terrifying. Intel also threatens retailers and manufacturer to use Intel chips/chipsets instead of competitor or else. Intel is in a legal battle now with Nvidia because of the newer chipsets that will not allow Nvidia cards to work on them. Clearly, Intel is positioning itself to bankrupt its competitors and become a monopoly in the CPU/GPU world. Intel has already been sued half a billion dollars in Europe for trying to bankrupt their competitor AMD, and sued over 300 million in the U.S. Once Intel releases its SOC chips, they will disable Nvidia from working on Intel motherboards.
This way, Intel has time to develop its hardware while preventing companies like Nvidia from profiting from GPUs. At this rate, I can only put about 7 documentaries on one 25g blu-ray when I could get 5 on the original DVD!Īttached is a screen shot, any help is greatly appreciated.Intel is aggressively putting a stop to OpenCL and CUDA development.Īt least until they can come up with a SOC (system on a chip), that integrates a GPU with the CPU. I read that you can put up to 23 hours of standard def on a blu-ray disc. I suppose 4 mbps is invalid for a blu-ray? I know it's probably trying to use a really high bit rate that's making it bigger. It also wants to turn these files into 3.3 gb sizes using 720x480/60i quality. I also have Power Director 10 from Cyberlink. My stand alone blu-ray player cannot play AVCHD videos recorded on a blu-ray disc (it can play them if it's on an SD card). So I guess my questions are this:Īre 352x480 videos in mpeg-2 even valid for a blu-ray?ĭoes the video have to be converted to a different file type? I've burned plenty of DVD's in my time, but it seems with blu-ray, it's a whole other ball game. I changed it to mpeg-2 and the file size actually enlarged a little, I had also chose "same as original". I assume it wants to convert the video to a large frame size. I put one file in the play list and it showed it taking 3.1 gb! I went to project settings and there is very little to change, the video format was AVC. I started up MY DVD and chose a 25gb disc. I already have a Philips blu-ray player hooked to the TV. I assumed with the expanded space of blu-ray, I could put many more documentaries on one of these 25gb discs, reducing the number of discs in my collection. I bought the blu-ray burner with the intention of putting these programs onto a blu-ray to play back in standard def only, no high definition video is intended. This is mainly VHS quality but good enough. The files are about 44 minutes of mpeg-2 video each and were in the 750 MB size range.
I copied a bunch of documentaries that I had recorded from an old stand alone DVD recorder hooked to the TV to my hard drive. I also installed a LG blu-ray disc burner. Graphics are Intel Graphics 4000 on the CPU chip. I just recently built a new computer, core i5 3570 Ivy Bridge and 8gb memory. Hello, first time posting here, thanks for your time!